Prospective protocols in evidence synthesis: building transparency and accountability

Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ. 2015;349

Rombey T, Allers K, Mathes T, Hoffmann F, Pieper D. A descriptive analysis of the characteristics and the peer review process of systematic review protocols published in an open peer review journal from 2012 to 2017. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 2019;19(1):57.

O'Mahony A, Haseldine C, Albers B, et al. Exploring Discrepancies between Protocols and Published Scoping Reviews in Implementation Science: Protocol for a Methodological Study. HRB Open Research. 2025;8:95.

Jesus TS. Rigour and transparency in the family of systematic reviews: The International Journal of Health Planning and Management encourages prospective protocol registration. Int. J. Health Plan. Manag. 2022;37(5):2523–2527.

Peters MD, Marnie C, Tricco AC, et al. Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI evidence synth. 2020;18(10):2119–2126.

Iannizzi C, Akl EA, Kahale LA, et al. Methods and guidance on conducting, reporting, publishing and appraising living systematic reviews: a scoping review protocol. F1000Research. 2021;10:802.

Peters MD, Godfrey C, McInerney P, et al. Best practice guidance and reporting items for the development of scoping review protocols. JBI evidence synth. 2022;20(4):953–968.

Allers K, Hoffmann F, Mathes T, Pieper D. Systematic reviews with published protocols compared to those without: more effort, older search. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2018;95:102–110.

van der Braak K, Ghannad M, Orelio C, et al. The score after 10 years of registration of systematic review protocols. Syst. Rev. 2022;11(1):191.

Moher D, Stewart L, Shekelle P. Implementing PRISMA-P: recommendations for prospective authors. Syst Rev. Jan 28 2016;5:15. doi:10.1186/s13643-016-0191-y

Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann. Intern. Med. 2018;169(7):467–473.

Aromataris, E., Lockwood, C., Porritt, K., Pilla, B., Jordan, Z. JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. JBI; 2024.

Munn Z, Peters MD, Stern C, Tufanaru C, McArthur A, Aromataris E. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 2018;18(1):143.

Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 2016;16(1):15.

Andrade R, Pereira R, Weir A, Ardern CL, Espregueira-Mendes J. Zombie reviews taking over the PROSPERO systematic review registry. It’s time to fight back! Br. J. Sports Med. 2019;53(15):919–921.

Carev M, Čivljak M, Puljak L, Došenović S. Characteristics, completion and publication of PROSPERO records in regional anesthesia for acute perioperative pain. J. Comp. Eff. Res. 2023;12(3):e220129.

Tawfik GM, Giang HTN, Ghozy S, et al. Protocol registration issues of systematic review and meta-analysis studies: a survey of global researchers. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 2020/08/25 2020;20(1):213. doi:10.1186/s12874-020-01094-9

Woo BFY, Tam WWS, Williams MY, et al. Characteristics, methodological, and reporting quality of scoping reviews published in nursing journals: A systematic review. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2023;55(4):874–885.

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372

Stevens A, Garritty C, Hersi M, Moher D. Developing PRISMA-RR, a reporting guideline for rapid reviews of primary studies (Protocol). Equator Network. 2018:1–12.