Applications, capabilities, and limitations of artificial intelligence in forensic odontology: a scoping review protocol
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62741/ahrj.v3iSuppl.248Keywords:
dentists, artificial intelligence, machine learning, forensic dentistryAbstract
Introduction: Forensic odontology plays an essential role in legal investigations by facilitating human identification through dental records, bite marks, and age estimation. Historically dependent on expert-driven, manual evaluations, this field is being reshaped by technological advancements. The integration of artificial intelligence, including machine learning, deep learning, and computer vision—offers new possibilities to automate and enhance analyses, improving diagnostic accuracy, accelerating case processing, and reducing subjectivity.
Objectives: The general objective of this study is to map and understand the implications, capabilities, and limitations of artificial intelligence technologies for forensic practitioners and legal stakeholders. To facilitate a targeted data extraction strategy, this review will address specific operational objectives, namely: to identify the primary areas of forensic dentistry where artificial intelligence is currently applied; to assess the reported capabilities and performance outcomes of various artificial intelligence models in these applications, to categorize the technical limitations and challenges reported in the literature, such as data quality, sample size, and lack of standardization, and to map the ethical and legal implications surrounding the use of AI in forensic contexts, including algorithm transparency and biometric data privacy.
Methodology: A scoping review will be performed according to the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and PRISMA-ScR guidelines. The protocol is registered on the Open Science Framework. Searches will be conducted across five scientific databases and grey literature, using specific keywords. Studies published between 2023 and 2025 in English, Portuguese, Spanish, and French will be considered. Study selection and screening will be managed via Rayyan.
Results: Expect to find multiple artificial intelligence techniques applied to forensic odontology, including machine learning and deep learning models for age and sex estimation. The review will likely demonstrate that AI can significantly enhance diagnostic accuracy and analysis speed, although its performance may be limited by dataset heterogeneity and a lack of standardization.
Conclusion: This scoping review will clarify the current state of evidence regarding the use of artificial intelligence in forensic identification. The findings may guide future research and support the development of ethical, standardized frameworks for implementing these technologies in medico-legal investigations.
References
Guimarães MI, Silveira A, Sequeira T, Gonçalves J, Carneiro Sousa MJ, Valenzuela A. Forensic Medicine and the Military Population: International Dental Records and Personal Identification Concerns. Acta Med Port. 2017;30(2):100-107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20344/amp.7703
Guimarães MI, Martínez Chicón J, Gonçalves J, Carneiro Sousa MJ, Márquez Ruiz AB, Valenzuela Garach A. Estudio comparativo de la diversidad de las características clínicas dentales en poblaciones militares de Portugal y Espana. Rev Esp Med Legal. 2018;44(3):99-107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reml.2017.11.005
Bewes J, Low A, Morphett A, Pate F, Henneberg M. Artificial intelligence for sex determination of skeletal remains: Application of a deep learning artificial neural network to human skulls. J Forensic Leg Med. 2019;62:40-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2019.01.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2019.01.004
Guimarães, M. I. (2026) Artificial intelligence in forensic odontology: technological developments and future directions. Forensic Sciences Research, 11(2): tfsr20250201 DOI: 10.3788/tfsr20250201https://doi.org/10.4103/sjhs.sjhs_124_23 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3788/tfsr20250201
Fan F, Ke W, Wu W, Tian X, Lyu T, Liu Y. Automatic human identification from panoramic dental radiographs using the convolutional neural network. Forensic Sci Int. 2020;314:110416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110416 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110416
Enomoto A, Lee AD, Sukedai M, Shimoide T, Katada R, Sugimoto K, et al. Automatic identification of individuals using deep learning method on panoramic radiographs. J Dent Sci. 2023;18(2):696-701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2022.10.021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2022.10.021
Rizvi S, Scanlon M, McGibney J, Sheppard J. Application of artificial intelligence to network forensics: Survey, challenges and future directions. IEEE Access. 2022;10:110362-110384. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3214506 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3214506
Stacey J, Fleming R, Sheppard D, Sheppard J, Dobbie G, Karunakaran D. A responsible artificial intelligence framework for forensic science. Forensic Sci Int. 2025;375:112548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2025.112548 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2025.112548
Pearson A, Wiechula R, Court A, Lockwood C. The JBI model of evidence-based healthcare. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2005;3(8):207-215. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-6988.2005.00026.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1479-6988.2005.00026.x
Pearson A, Jordan Z, Munn Z. Translational science and evidence-based healthcare: A clarification and reconceptualization of how knowledge is generated and used in healthcare. Nurs Res Pract. 2012;2012:792519. doi: 10.1155/2012/792519. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/792519
Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A. Rayyan — a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2016;5(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4
McGowan J, Sampson M, Salzwedel DM, Cogo E, Foerster V, Lefebvre C. PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jul;75:40-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.01.021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.01.021
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2021;10(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4
Jordan Z, Lockwood C, Munn Z, Aromataris E. The updated Joanna Briggs Institute model for evidence-based healthcare. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2019;17(1):58-71. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000155
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Maria Inês Guimarães, Rafael Pinto, Inês Lopes Cardoso (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright in published articles is retained by the authors. All articles are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0). Users may read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, link to, and reuse the full text for lawful non-commercial purposes, provided that appropriate attribution is given.
