Lab-on-a chip: Nanobiosensors for Point-of-care Diagnostics: from technology to diagnostics.
From technology to Diagnostics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62741/ahrj.v3i2.268Keywords:
diagnosis, nanobiosensors, pathogen, point-of-careAbstract
Introduction: The pressing need for rapid and sensitive diagnostic tools has driven innovation in nanobiosensors and smart microfluidic systems for Point-of-Care (POC) applications. The integration of advanced nanomaterials (such as graphene and nanoparticles) with microscale detection technologies has opened doors to highly specific in situ analysis of biomarkers for cancer and infectious diseases. However, although these Lab-on-a-chip (LoC) platforms represent the pinnacle of this new diagnostic generation, the transition of these advanced technologies from laboratory proof-of-concept to commercial success faces serious hurdles.
Objectives: The main objective of this literature review is to identify LoC platforms already implemented in clinical practice, compare their efficacy with current reference methods, and critically analyse the main obstacles limiting their commercialization and widespread adoption.
Methodology: A comprehensive search of the scientific literature was conducted for articles published between 2010 and 2026. A total of 49 articles were identified. Of these, 27 were excluded based on relevance criteria and 22 were included in this review.
Results: Lab-on-a-chip (LoC) platforms and microfluidic devices offer significant advantages in various clinical areas, such as early cancer detection, infectious disease diagnosis, and fertility treatments, surpassing traditional methods in terms of speed and efficiency. However, their large-scale clinical adoption is still hindered by major challenges. Chief among these obstacles are the technological difficulties in integrating the chips with existing equipment and workflows, the economic and regulatory barriers linked to high production and commercialisation costs, and the negative environmental impact caused by the plastic waste from disposable devices. In summary, although this technology presents clear technical benefits, its global implementation depends on the ability to overcome these technological, economic, and environmental barriers.
Conclusion: The true clinical impact of LoC technologies will depend on overcoming current manufacturing and interface barriers. The development of sustainable, low-cost alternatives, such as paper-based electrochemical biosensors, is a promising strategy not only to reduce environmental waste but also to democratise access to diagnostics in resource-limited settings and developing countries.
References
Nosrati R. Lab on a chip devices for fertility: from proof-of-concept to clinical impact. Lab Chip. 2022;22(9):1680-1689. doi:10.1039/D1LC01144H DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/D1LC01144H
Manjusha M, Yasasve M, Saravanan M. Lab-on-a-chip microfluidic devices: A platform for easy, effective and early diagnosis of cancer with analysis of circulating tumour cells. International Journal of Surgery. 2022;106:106906. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106906 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106906
Lehnert T, Gijs MAM. Microfluidic systems for infectious disease diagnostics. Lab Chip. 2024;24(5):1441-1493. doi:10.1039/D4LC00117F DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/D4LC00117F
Wang C, Liu M, Wang Z, Li S, Deng Y, He N. Point-of-care diagnostics for infectious diseases: From methods to devices. Nano Today. 2021;37:101092. doi:10.1016/j.nantod.2021.101092 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2021.101092
Ardila CM. Advancing healthcare through laboratory on a chip technology: Transforming microorganism identification and diagnostics. World J Clin Cases. 2025;13(3). doi:10.12998/wjcc.v13.i3.97737 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v13.i3.97737
Xu T, Bai H, Hu J, et al. Lab-on-a-chip for biomarker detection: advances, practical applications, and future perspectives. Lab Chip. 2026;26(5):1053-1079. doi:10.1039/D5LC00986C DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/D5LC00986C
Martin CL. i-STAT – Combining Chemistry and Haematology in PoCT. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2924126/pdf/cbr31_3_pg81.pdf
Larcher R, Lottelier M, Badiou S, Dupuy AM, Bargnoux AS, Cristol JP. Analytical Performances of the Novel i-STAT Alinity Point-of-Care Analyzer. Diagnostics. 2023;13(2):297. doi:10.3390/diagnostics13020297 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13020297
Ackermann TN, Giménez-Gómez P, Muñoz-Berbel X, Llobera A. Plug and measure – a chip-to-world interface for photonic lab-on-a-chip applications. Lab Chip. 2016;16(17):3220-3226. doi:10.1039/C6LC00462H DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/C6LC00462H
Chiadò A, Palmara G, Chiappone A, et al. A modular 3D printed lab-on-a-chip for early cancer detection. Lab Chip. 2020;20(3):665-674. doi:10.1039/C9LC01108K DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/C9LC01108K
Gotham D, McKenna L, Deborggraeve S, Madoori S, Branigan D. Public investments in the development of GeneXpert molecular diagnostic technology. Horton S, ed. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(8):e0256883. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0256883 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256883
Ataide VN, Pradela-Filho LA, Ameku WA, et al. Paper-based electrochemical biosensors for the diagnosis of viral diseases. Microchim Acta. 2023;190(7):276. doi:10.1007/s00604-023-05856-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-023-05856-2
Faria MGBFD, Andrade RLDP, Camillo AJG, et al. Efetividade do GeneXpert® no diagnóstico da tuberculose em pessoas que vivem com HIV/aids. Rev saúde pública. 2021;55:89. doi:10.11606/s1518-8787.2021055003125 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2021055003125
Bergas A, Lopez De Egea G, Albasanz-Puig A, et al. Effectiveness of the BioFire FilmArray for the rapid detection of bloodstream infection in haematological patients with febrile neutropenia (the ONFIRE study): study protocol of a prospective, multicentre observational study at three reference university hospitals in Spain. BMJ Open. 2025;15(6):e101040. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101040 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101040
Saeed M, Ahmad M, Iram S, Riaz S, Akhtar M, Aslam M. GeneXpert technology: A breakthrough for the diagnosis of tuberculous pericarditis and pleuritis in less than 2 hours. SMJ. 2017;38(7):699-705. doi:10.15537/smj.2017.7.17694 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15537/smj.2017.7.17694
Nair CB, Manjula J, Subramani PA, et al. Differential Diagnosis of Malaria on Truelab Uno®, a Portable, Real-Time, MicroPCR Device for Point-Of-Care Applications. Carvalho LH, ed. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(1):e0146961. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0146961 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146961
Kolluri N, Klapperich CM, Cabodi M. Towards lab-on-a-chip diagnostics for malaria elimination. Lab Chip. 2018;18(1):75-94. doi:10.1039/C7LC00758B DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/C7LC00758B
Stumpf F, Schwemmer F, Hutzenlaub T, et al. LabDisk with complete reagent prestorage for sample-to-answer nucleic acid based detection of respiratory pathogens verified with influenza A H3N2 virus. Lab Chip. 2016;16(1):199-207. doi:10.1039/C5LC00871A DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/C5LC00871A
Li B, Kumar A, Finlay C, et al. Verification of point-of-care analysers for C-reactive protein, lipid studies and glycated haemoglobin. Pathology. 2023;55(7):989-999. doi:10.1016/j.pathol.2023.07.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pathol.2023.07.004
Sehgal IS, Dhooria S, Aggarwal AN, Behera D, Agarwal R. Diagnostic Performance of Xpert MTB/RIF in Tuberculous Pleural Effusion: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Land GA, ed. J Clin Microbiol. 2016;54(4):1133-1136. doi:10.1128/JCM.03205-15 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.03205-15
Du J, Huang Z, Luo Q, et al. Rapid diagnosis of pleural tuberculosis by Xpert MTB/RIF assay using pleural biopsy and pleural fluid specimens. Journal of Research in Medical Sciences. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4354061/pdf/JRMS-20-26.pdf
Shuler ML. Organ-on-a-chip systems: translating concept into practice. Lab Chip. 2020;20(17):3072-3073. doi:10.1039/D0LC90083D DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/D0LC90083D
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Débora Pinto, José Cabeda (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright in published articles is retained by the authors. All articles are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0). Users may read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, link to, and reuse the full text for lawful non-commercial purposes, provided that appropriate attribution is given.








