Machine learning predictive models for intraoperatively acquired pressure ulcers: a scoping review protocol

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62741/ahrj.v3iSuppl.282

Keywords:

Pressure Ulcer, Machine Learning, Artificial Intelligence, Intraoperative Complications, Perioperative Nursing, Risk Assessment

Abstract

Introduction: Intraoperatively acquired pressure ulcers (IAPUs) are a frequent, costly and largely preventable complication of surgery. Traditional tools such as the Braden Scale ignore intraoperative risk factors, and surgical-specific scales capture only a small part of the data routinely recorded during surgery. Machine learning (ML) models can integrate these data, but the evidence on ML models developed specifically for IAPUs has not yet been mapped.

Objectives: To map and analyze the literature on ML predictive models for IAPUs in adult surgical patients: algorithms, input variables, outcome definitions, validation strategies, performance and calibration metrics, explainability methods, comparisons with traditional scales and barriers to clinical implementation.

Methodology: Scoping review following the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and the Population–Concept–Context framework, reported according to PRISMA-ScR. PubMed, CINAHL Complete, Scopus, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, IEEE Xplore and grey literature will be searched for sources published between 2000 and 2026 in English, French, Italian, Portuguese or Spanish. Two reviewers will independently screen and select sources, with a third reviewer resolving disagreements. The protocol is registered on the Open Science Framework [blinded for peer review].

Results: Data will be extracted by two independent reviewers with a piloted charting tool and presented in tables, charts and an evidence map of predictors, accompanied by a narrative synthesis.

Conclusion: This review will map the landscape of ML-based IAPU prediction, identify gaps in the literature and inform the development of an explainable, clinically deployable risk index for the operating room.

References

National Pressure Injury Advisory P, European Pressure Ulcer Advisory P, Pan Pacific Pressure Injury A. Haesler E, ed. Prevention and Treatment of Pressure Ulcers/Injuries: Quick Reference Guide. The International Guideline: Fourth Edition. 4th ed. 2026. Accessed 11/09/2026. https://internationalguideline.com

Li Z, Lin F, Thalib L, Chaboyer W. Global prevalence and incidence of pressure injuries in hospitalised adult patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Stud. May 2020;105:103546. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103546

Padula WV, Delarmente BA. The national cost of hospital-acquired pressure injuries in the United States. Int Wound J. Jun 2019;16(3):634–640. doi:10.1111/iwj.13071

Gefen A, Creehan S, Black J. Critical biomechanical and clinical insights concerning tissue protection when positioning patients in the operating room: A scoping review. Int Wound J. Oct 2020;17(5):1405–1423. doi:10.1111/iwj.13408

Fred C, Ford S, Wagner D, Vanbrackle L. Intraoperatively acquired pressure ulcers and perioperative normothermia: a look at relationships. AORN J. Sep 2012;96(3):251–60. doi:10.1016/j.aorn.2012.06.014

Chen HL, Chen XY, Wu J. The incidence of pressure ulcers in surgical patients of the last 5 years: a systematic review. Wounds. Sep 2012;24(9):234–41.

Kurian S, Moore Z, Patton D, George S. The Incidence of Pressure Ulcers in Surgical Patients: A Systematic Review. Int Wound J. Aug 2025;22(8):e70738. doi:10.1111/iwj.70738

Yoshimura M, Ohura N, Santamaria N, Watanabe Y, Akizuki T, Gefen A. High body mass index is a strong predictor of intraoperative acquired pressure injury in spinal surgery patients when prophylactic film dressings are applied: A retrospective analysis prior to the BOSS Trial. Int Wound J. Jun 2020;17(3):660–669. doi:10.1111/iwj.13287

Ma LY, Chen HL, Gu HY, Hua L, Gao XM. Analysis of the clinical features and risk factors of device-related pressure injuries in the operating room. Int Wound J. Mar 2023;20(3):706–715. doi:10.1111/iwj.13912

Chen Y, Wang W, Qian Q, Wu BW. Changes of transcutaneous oxygen pressure in compressed areas of surgical patients: A prospective study of influencing factors. J Tissue Viability. Aug 2024;33(3):452–457. doi:10.1016/j.jtv.2024.05.012

He W, Liu P, Chen HL. The Braden Scale cannot be used alone for assessing pressure ulcer risk in surgical patients: a meta-analysis. Ostomy Wound Manage. Feb 2012;58(2):34–40.

Aslan Basli A, Yavuz Van Giersbergen M, Ozdemir T. Comparison of the predictive validity of the Braden, Munro and 3S scales in surgical patients. J Tissue Viability. Nov 2024;33(4):657–665. doi:10.1016/j.jtv.2024.06.011

Lopes CM, Haas VJ, Dantas RA, Oliveira CG, Galvao CM. Assessment scale of risk for surgical positioning injuries. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. Aug 29 2016;24:e2704. doi:10.1590/1518-8345.0644.2704

Salvini A, Silva E, Passos C, et al. Validation of ELPO-PT: A Risk Assessment Scale for Surgical Positioning Injuries in the Portuguese Context. Nurs Rep. Oct 30 2024;14(4):3242–3263. doi:10.3390/nursrep14040236

Chen Y, Wang W, Qian Q, Wu B. Comparison of four risk assessment scales in predicting the risk of intraoperative acquired pressure injury in adult surgical patients: a prospective study. J Int Med Res. Oct 2023;51(10):3000605231207530. doi:10.1177/03000605231207530

Pei J, Guo X, Tao H, et al. Machine learning-based prediction models for pressure injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Wound J. Dec 2023;20(10):4328–4339. doi:10.1111/iwj.14280

Alderden J, Johnny J, Brooks KR, et al. Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Early Prediction of Pressure Injury Risk. Am J Crit Care. Sep 1 2024;33(5):373–381. doi:10.4037/ajcc2024856

Gao L, Yang L, Li X, et al. The use of a logistic regression model to develop a risk assessment of intraoperatively acquired pressure ulcer. J Clin Nurs. Aug 2018;27(15-16):2984–2992. doi:10.1111/jocn.14491

Cai J-Y, Zha M-L, Song Y-P, Chen H-L. Predicting the Development of Surgery-Related Pressure Injury Using a Machine Learning Algorithm Model. Journal of Nursing Research. 2020/12/21 2021;29(1):e135. doi:10.1097/JNR.0000000000000411

Li N, Cui D, Shan L, et al. The prediction model for intraoperatively acquired pressure injuries in orthopedics based on the new risk factors: a real-world prospective observational, cross-sectional study. Front Physiol. 2023;14:1170564. doi:10.3389/fphys.2023.1170564

Cheng Y, Li L, Zhang J, et al. Prediction of intraoperative acquired pressure injury in elderly cardiac surgery patients via machine learning: model development with the MIMIC-IV and external validation. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. Dec 29 2025;26(1):33. doi:10.1186/s12911-025-03325-9

Zhou Y, Yang X, Ma S, Yuan Y, Yan M. A systematic review of predictive models for hospital-acquired pressure injury using machine learning. Nursing Open. 2023;10(3):1234–1246. doi:10.1002/nop2.1429

Barghouthi EaD, Owda AY, Asia M, Owda M. Systematic review for risks of pressure injury and prediction models using machine learning algorithms. Diagnostics. 2023;13(17):2739. doi:10.3390/diagnostics13172739

Alves J, Azevedo R, Marques A, Encarnacao R, Alves P. Pressure injury prediction in intensive care units using artificial intelligence: A scoping review. Nursing Reports. 2025;15(4):126. doi:10.3390/nursrep15040126

Hillier B, Scandrett K, Coombe A, et al. Risk prediction tools for pressure injury occurrence: An umbrella review of systematic reviews reporting model development and validation methods. Diagnostic and Prognostic Research. 2025;9(1)doi:10.1186/s41512-024-00182-4

Xu Y, Zhao H, Wu S, et al. Prediction Models for Intraoperative Acquired Pressure Injury of Adults: A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal. Advances in Wound Care. 2026;15(4):228–245. doi:10.1089/wound.2024.0238

Collins GS, Moons KGM, Dhiman P, et al. TRIPOD+AI statement: updated guidance for reporting clinical prediction models that use regression or machine learning methods. BMJ. Apr 16 2024;385:e078378. doi:10.1136/bmj-2023-078378

Munn Z, Peters MDJ, Stern C, Tufanaru C, McArthur A, Aromataris E. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Med Res Methodol. Nov 19 2018;18(1):143. doi:10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x

Peters MDJ, Marnie C, Tricco AC, et al. Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evid Implement. Mar 2021;19(1):3–10. doi:10.1097/XEB.0000000000000277

Munn Z, Pollock D, Khalil H, et al. What are scoping reviews? Providing a formal definition of scoping reviews as a type of evidence synthesis. JBI Evidence Synthesis. 2022;20(4):950–952. doi:10.11124/JBIES-21-00483

Peters MDJ, Godfrey C, McInerney P, Munn Z, Tricco AC, Khalil H. Scoping reviews. In: Aromataris E, Lockwood C, Porritt K, Pilla B, Jordan Z, eds. JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. JBI; 2024.

Peters MDJ, Godfrey C, McInerney P, et al. Best practice guidance and reporting items for the development of scoping review protocols. JBI Evid Synth. Apr 1 2022;20(4):953–968. doi:10.11124/JBIES-21-00242

Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Ann Intern Med. Oct 2 2018;169(7):467–473. doi:10.7326/M18-0850

Rethlefsen ML, Kirtley S, Waffenschmidt S, et al. PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews. Syst Rev. Jan 26 2021;10(1):39. doi:10.1186/s13643-020-01542-z

Khalil H, Peters MD, Tricco AC, et al. Conducting high quality scoping reviews-challenges and solutions. J Clin Epidemiol. Feb 2021;130:156–160. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.10.009

Cai JY, Zha ML, Song YP, Chen HL. Predicting the Development of Surgery-Related Pressure Injury Using a Machine Learning Algorithm Model. J Nurs Res. Dec 21 2020;29(1):e135. doi:10.1097/JNR.0000000000000411

Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A. Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev. Dec 5 2016;5(1):210. doi:10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. Mar 29 2021;372:n71. doi:10.1136/bmj.n71

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). Sep 2021;74(9):790–799. Declaracion PRISMA 2020: una guia actualizada para la publicacion de revisiones sistematicas. doi:10.1016/j.rec.2021.07.010

Pollock D, Peters MDJ, Khalil H, et al. Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews. JBI Evid Synth. Mar 1 2023;21(3):520–532. doi:10.11124/JBIES-22-00123

Downloads

Published

10-11-2026