Analysis of the dimensions of temporary molar crowns on digital study models: cross-sectional study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62741/ahrj.v3iSuppl.%202.185Keywords:
Temporary molars, Dental dimensions, Scanner, Digital models, Temporary dentitionAbstract
Introduction: The analysis of primary molar crown dimensions using digital study models is an important aspect of pediatric dentistry and orthodontics, allowing accurate morphometric assessment of primary teeth.
Objectives: To characterize the crown dimensions of primary molars by measuring the mesiodistal, vestibulolingual/palatal dimensions and crown height of deciduous molars from a group of Portuguese children aged between 7 and 13 years, using intraoral scanner images (iTero). To analyze whether there are significant differences in the measurements based on variables such as sexual dimorphism, differences according to dental side of the dental arch, the variation in molar dimensions in different age groups, and the presence of correlation between the variables.
Methodology: A cross-sectional study was conducted using STL files obtained from intraoral scans of 100 Portuguese children aged 7–13 years. The inclusion criterion was children aged between 7 and 13 years. Exclusion criteria comprised restored primary teeth, carious primary teeth, partially erupted primary teeth, and primary teeth presenting developmental defects. The mesiodistal, buccolingual/palatinal dimensions and crown height of the first and second primary molars were digitally measured on three-dimensional models. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software. All measurements were performed by a single examiner and independently verified by a second examiner.
Results: The crown dimensions of the first and second primary molars showed low variability across the sample. The overall mean mesiodistal dimension was 7.68 ± 0.04 mm, with slightly higher values in males (7.76 ± 0.06 mm) than in females (7.59 ± 0.06 mm). Similarly, the overall mean buccolingual/palatinal dimension was slightly higher in males (8.57 ± 0.07 mm) than in females (8.29 ± 0.08 mm). The mean mesial lingual/palatal cusp height was 3.88 ± 0.05 mm in males and 3.80 ± 0.05 mm in females, while the mean distal lingual/palatal cusp height was 3.23 ± 0.06 mm and 3.22 ± 0.06 mm, respectively. However, no statistically significant differences were found between sexes, age groups, or homologous teeth (p > 0.05). Strong positive correlations were observed among the three crown dimensions evaluated.
Conclusion: This study provides reference morphometric data for the crown dimensions of first and second primary molars in Portuguese children aged 7–13 years. The evaluated dimensions showed a homogeneous distribution and low variability, suggesting relatively stable morphometric characteristics within this population.
References
Abaid, S., Kruger, E., Tennent, M., & Zafar, S. (2021). Mesiodistal dimensions and sexual dimorphism of teeth of contemporary western australian adolescents. Journal of Oral Science, 63(3).
Afshar, H., Kamali, S. A., & Shahrabi, M. (2015). Comparison of primary molar crown dimensions with stainless steel crowns in a sample of iranian children. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects, 9(2), 86-91. https://doi.org/10.15171/joddd.2014.017
Aktaş, N., & Ciftci, V. (2024) Current applications of three-dimensional (3D) printing in pediatric dentistry: a literature review. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 48(5):4-13. https://doi.org/10.22514/jocpd.2024.099
Anderson, A. A. (2005). Dentition and occlusion development in African American children: mesiodistal crown diameters and tooth-size ratios of primary teeth. Pediatr Dent; 27(2), 121-8.
Anfe, T., Arakaki, Y., Nakamura, D., & Vieira, G. (2012). Mesiodistal and buccolingual dimensions of primary teeth in a brazilian population. Brazilian Dental Science, 15(1), 74-78.
Aragoneses, J. M., Giovannini, G., Martín-Vacas, A., Paz-Cortés, M. M., & Serrano-Velasco, D. (2024). Accuracy analysis of digital models from intraoral scanners and 3D-printed casts in children and teenagers. Children, 11(9), 1082. https://doi.org/10.3390/children11091082
Avula, J. S., Enuganti, S., Eswara K., Kakarla, Mallela, G. K., & Margana, J. G. (2014). Deciduous molar sizes and sexual dimorphism: South Indian study. J Pediatr Dent, 2(1), 13-9. https://doi.org./ 10.4103/2321-6646.130377
Axelsson, G., & Kirveskari, P. (1984). Crown size of deciduous teeth in Icelanders. Acta Odontol Scand, 42(6), 339-343. https://doi.org./10.3109/00016358409033613
Barbería, E., Maroto, M., Suárez, M. C., & Villalón, G. (2009). Standards for mseiodistal and buccolingual crown size and height of primary molars in a sample os spanish children. European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry, 10(4), 169-75.
Bhavyaa, R., Latha, N., Muthu, M. S., Sneha, S. P., & Sujitha, P. (2022). Crown dimensions of primary teeth-A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Forensic Sci, 67(4), 1348-1356. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.15015
Bell, A., Dean, J. A., & McDonald, R. E. (2016). Treatment of the developing dentition and occlusion in pediatric dentistry. (10th ed.). McDonald and Avery’s Dentistry for the Child and Adolescent.
Bellapukonda, P. K., Koyyalamudi, A. S., Madhuri, U., & Yenni, M. (2024). Digitalization of pediatric dentistry: a review. Academia Journal of Medicine, 7(1): 6-10
Bohner, L., Gamba, D. D., Hanisch, M., Laganá D. C., Marcio, B. S., Sesma, N., & Tortamano, N. P. (2019). Accuracy of digital technologies for the scanning of facial, skeletal, and intraoral tissues: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent, 121(2), 246-251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.01.015
Brook, A. H., & Fearne, J. M. (1993). Small primary tooth-crown size in low birthweight children. Early Hum Dev, 33(2), 81-90. https://doi.org./ 10.1016/0378-3782(93)90203-7
Brown, T., & Margetts, B. (1978). Crown diameters of deciduous teeth in Australian aboriginals. Am J Phys Antrophol, 48(4), 493-502. https://doi.org./ 10.1002/ajpa.1330480408
Chao, T. T., & Tsai, H. H. (2023) Comparison of the morphology of the primary first molars and the forms of stainless steel crowns used in clinical practice. Journal Of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, 47(3),71-83.
Clark, P., & Tafti, A. (2023). Anatomy, Head and Neck, Primary Dentition. StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK573074/
Das, A., Gupta, S., Isha, S., Panwar, M., & Singh, U. (2023). Role of intraoral scanners in pediatric dentistry. International Journal of Medical and Dental Sciences, 12(1), 2071–2076.
Dinelli, T. C. dos S., Martins, L. P., & Pinto, A. dos S. (2004) Mudanças dimensionais dos arcos dentários em crianças entre 3 e 6 anos de idade. Revista Dental Press de Ortodontia e Ortopedia Facial, 9(4), 60-67. https://doi.org./10.1590/S1415-54192004000400006
Fernando, L., Javier, G., Javier, H., León, C., Luque, L., Tamariz, M. A. C., & Vargas, P. (2013). Estudio comparativo del tamaño mesiodistal entre dientes homólogos en dentición permanente. Odontologia Sanmarquina, 16(2), 7-11.
Ghorbanyjavadpour, F., Jamali, K., Rakhshan, V., & Roayaei, A. M. (2024). Morphometric variations and nonmetric anatomical traits or anomalies of the primary molar teeth, plus the molars' size thresholds for sex identification. BMC Oral Health, 24(1), 200. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-03908-4
Harari, D., Kuraita-Landman, S., & Steigman, S. (1982). Relationship between mesiodistal crown diameter of posterior deciduous and succedaneous teeth in Israeli children. Eur J Orthod, 4(3), 219-227. https://doi.org./ 10.1093/ejo/4.3.219
Kahlon, S. S., Manchanda, A. S., Narang, R.S., & Singh, B. (2015). Diagonal tooth measurements in sex assessment: A study on North Indian population. J Forensic Dent Sci, 7(2), 126-31. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-1475.146371
Karibe, H., Kawakami, T., Okamoto, A., Shinya, A., & Tanaka, S. (2024). Reliability of mixed dentition space analysis using a digital model obtained from an optical impression: a preliminary study. BMC Res Notes, 17(1),12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-023-06678-4
Kenessey, D. E., Paul, K.S., & Stojanowski, C. M. (2024). Evaluating predictions of the patterning cascade model of crown morphogenesis in the human lower mixed and permanent dentition. PLoS One, 19(6). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0304455
Lukacs, J. R. (2022). Sexual dimorphism in deciduous tooth crown size: variability within and between groups. Am J Hum Biol, 34(10), e23793. https://doi.org./10.1002/ajhb.23793
Shi, W. H., Tang, Z. W., Wang, Y., Xia, B., Yang, J., & Zhao, Y.J. (2022). Design of non-metallic crown for primary molars and analyzation of stress distribution: a finite element study. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi, 57(3), 242-250. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112144-20210513-00227
So, L. L., Tang, E. L., & Yuen, K. K. (1997). Mesiodistal crown diameters of the primary and permanent teeth of Hong Kong Chinese-a longitudinal study. Eur J Orthod, 19(6), 721-731. https://doi.org./ 10.1093/ejo/19.6.721
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Athena Health & Research Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright of published papers is assigned to the Journal, but all content is licensed under the terms of Creative Commons Non-comercial 4.0 International License. Thus users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
